Review and priorities
Agree representative views, journeys and WCAG criteria. Findings identify the affected element and how to reproduce the issue.
I assess and improve website navigation, content, forms and interfaces. Review, remediation and verification cover a defined set of pages, states and user journeys.
Strategy, content and code. From diagnosis to implementation.
Automated tools find part of the problem. I also examine keyboard behaviour, focus order, information structure and form interactions. The assessment relates to specific views and states.
Agree representative views, journeys and WCAG criteria. Findings identify the affected element and how to reproduce the issue.
Headings, landmarks, labels, focus, menus and keyboard operation. Behaviour matters alongside appearance.
Clear instructions, errors, labels and states help people understand what happened and how to continue.
Implement agreed changes, repeat affected scenarios and document limitations outside the scope.
I lead the diagnosis and key decisions. We agree the scope and responsibilities before implementation.
Choose views, users and key tasks to assess.
Combine tools with manual review and implement the agreed changes.
Repeat the corrected scenarios and report remaining limitations.
No. Manual assessment is also needed, including keyboard operation, focus, structure and feedback.
Yes. The available changes depend on the theme, components and external integrations. Those dependencies are assessed first.
The result covers the agreed scope and tested states. It is not replaced by a blanket promise or a tool score.
Send your website address and describe the goal or the issue. I will help identify the scope and the next step.
+48 695 987 600See all contact details